Thursday, December 27, 2012

Ancient Greece Citizens

When we use the word "citizens" we are usually referring to a group of people who live in the same city, with a common origin, language, customs and laws. According to Plato, the ideal city should have no more than 5000 inhabitants, so that they would all know each other. But in 5th century Athens, things were somewhat different, with approximately 40,000 citizens, 20,000 metoici (resident aliens) and about 100,000 slaves. To these we must also add the women and children, who were never included in the numbers of inhabitants.

The male inhabitants of Athens were divided into three groups: citizens, metoici and slaves. Athenian citizens were only men 18 years of age and older whose forebears had been Athenians for three generations. These fortunate people enjoyed all the rights of free men and could be elected to all the offices of the State. The villager who arrived at dawn from Acharnes in order to take part in the daily draw for participation in some service, had the same possibility of being elected as the son of the old-time aristocrat. This ability to concern one's self with public matters naturally persupposed the existence of leisure time. Athenian citizens preferred not to work, but rather tried to be men of independent means, having others look after the cultivation of their lands and the administration of their property. Manual labour, even artistic creation, was considered by many to be degrading. Despite this, Socrates made a speech urging the poor people to work, even though he himself did precisely the opposite. The need for manpower was often covered by the thetes who were the poorest of the citizens and made their living as workers or as rural day-labourers. In this way, wealthier Athenians were absolutely free to occupy themselves with public matters, primarily with politics. But the poor citizens were obligated to present a certain minimum attendance at the Assembly, and for this reason the state had the foresight to provide some money for those who represented their tribe at sessions and trials, thus at least making good their lost earnings.

All inhabitants paid the same taxes. In addition, the wealthy undertook sponsorships thus acquiring both the moral satisfaction of their contribution and the social prestige. They served in the army in accordance with their income: as knights with their own horse and a suitable retinue, or in the navy as captains of trirenes, which they themselves took care to man. The poor but proud thetes frequently preferred the harsh life of the oarsman, solely to show their identity as free equal citizens, even though the earnings were meagre. Wealthy, poor or destitute, Athenian citizens were all extremely proud of their origin, so proud that they never called their city "Athens" but the "city of the Athenians". Participating in the administration of the Polis was taken for granted for the citizen who voted, judged and, like all people with plenty of free time, took care to be informed about what was happening in the city. This dedication of the Athenians to public life made them obey the laws and worry about any possible breach of the law which would cause them to be downgraded through the loss of their citizen's rights.

Ancient Greece Citizens

One might say that the biographers of the Athenian citizens were Aristophanes, Plato, Xenophon and Plutarch, each from a different point of view. Much of what we know about the working classes is taken from peevish references in the comedies of Aristophanes, whose sharp tongue conceals nothing. He may have been making fun of the village lout, who went to the Agora reeking of garlic to hear a philosopher speak without realising it, but he also gave us information about each person's chances of acquiring knowledge. From the kindly villager Strepsiades in Clouds, we hear complaints about his wife, a woman from the capital city, who makes him wash and take off his comfortable but dirty clothes, and we realise that an unsuitable marriage has always been a disaster. Xenophon, also, was a practical man of the city who fought far away from his homeland, became acquainted with the people of other countries and developed the taste for a city open to all kinds of positive influences, even foreign. This breadth of mind may perhaps have been the natural destiny of a dynamic man who undertook to lead his fellow soldiers from distant Mesopotamia, through the highlands of Armenia, to the shores of the Black Sea, and finally home. Plutarch, too, who was born in Chaeronia in the first century AD, has left us invaluable information about public life and chiefly about certain famous Athenians whom he included in his Lives.

Plato, one of the most significant figures in the history of philosophy, was born of a father who came from the Kodros family, and a mother from that of Solon. He usually wrote in the form of a dialogue in which he himself did not appear, although he put his views into the mouth of Socrates, his teacher. Plato enlivened his social environment in which refined men went to symposia and exchanged views about philosophy or music. At the home of the enormously wealthy Kallias, for example, intellectuals speculated on whether virtue could be taught; they would spend their evenings with music from a lyre accompanying their conversation or perhaps with the occasional song. Although all had some musical training, no one would agree to play the flute, because to do so one had to disfigure one's face by puffing up one's cheeks to make sound. At the most famous supper in history, the participants selected eros (love) as the subject for the evening. This was the Symposium at which well-to-do Athenian citizens represented by aristocrats, men of learning, poets, politicians and philosophers joined together in a lively discussion. Together with Socrates, the invited guest, they also welcomed a poor barefoot man who was fortunate enough to be Socrates' pupil and follower. Each one spoke on the selected topic, expressing his views in a witty and pleasant way. At some point the handsome Alcibiades appeared, roaring drunk, leaning on a courtesan and garlanded with Attic pansies. Even though a great deal of wine was consumed, the discussion continued without exceeding the bounds of propriety, while other groups of revellers were constantly coming and going.

They all agreed that eros has the greatest power since it awakes in human beings abilities to distinguish themselves and that it also is a factor deterring unseemly behaviour, as one is afraid to lose face in the eyes of the beloved. Everybody distinguished the transient physical attraction of Aphrodite from the uncorrupted beauty of Urania who brings souls closer together, approaching perfection. They would say in jest that eros always looks young because by leaving, he avoids growing old; and perhaps he is always immortal because he lives, is lost and is reborn again. They concluded that what is important in love is quality, to whichever sex one's love is addressed, because eros is the purpose and not the object of desire. Such were the surroundings of the golden youth of Athens who, listening to such lofty discussions, would fall in love at will, admired physical beauty and the intellectual vigour of wise men with equal ardour, and whenever required, went into battle where they won awards for valour. Athenian citizens were people who could live in a democratic world with the subtlety of an aristocrat; they obliged Plato to say how praiseworthy was the man who could distinguish between the three gradations in the human personality: free speech, courage and base desires. The ideal citizen never allows the first two to be subjugated by the last.

The large number of metoici was a purely Athenian phenomenon, as xenophobic Sparta kept those who were not from its region at a distance. Athens on the contrary, was open to Greeks from other cities and even to foreigners who wished to live and work in Attica. The metoici had all the obligations of the Athenian citizen but enjoyed very few of his rights. They lived scattered over the townships, paid taxes and served in the army only as hoplites (footsoldiers). They were able to acquire goods and slaves, but were not permitted to own land. They could worship any gods they chose, but had no right to vote nor could they be elected to any important office, only to the lower ones, e.g. as heralds or contractors for public works. Most of them were artisans, merchants and a good number acted as bankers.

Since they constituted the productive class, many of them became wealthy and distinguished themselves through sponsorships, indeed some became legally accepted into the class of citizens. On the contrary, if a metoicos attempted to usurp the rights of the free citizen illegally, then he was downgraded to a slave. In trials, metoici always had to have the support of an Athenian citizen as guarantor and it is characteristic that if a metoicos killed a citizen, he was condemned to death, while if he murdered another metoicos, the punishment was only exile. The children of marriages between citizens and metoici were not considered to be Athenians unless they won general esteem through wealth or special acts. Many famous artists and philosophers in ancient Athens were metoici and it seems that they accepted their treatment as second-class citizens without protest. Generally, Athenian citizens treated metoici with the politeness of a host toward a welcome guest, up to the point where vested interests were affected, and above all the inherited tradition of the state.

Women, in the homes of both citizens of Athens and metoici, had absolutely no right to hold an opinion or to participate in public affairs. The Athenian imagination justified depriving women of their rights since the goddess Athena had won the contest for the naming of the city by just one female vote. It was then that the matriarchy was nearly set aside in favour of the warrior protectors, who never tolerated female initiatives, which is why women were punished by being excluded from any future important decision. This happened at the time of Kekrops who established marriage as a consolation, making it the primary goal in the life of Athenian women. And of course, marriage meant having children, which is why from birth to death, the female Athenian remained confined inside the home. Girls were married very young to a husband selected by their fathers, to whom they owed absolute obedience. They had to be fully familiar with housekeeping, command the respect of the household slaves and be imbued with a spirit of economy. If an educated slave happened to live in the house then there was a possibility that the girls would learn some reading and writing; but more frequently they were taught only music and dancing.

If a daughter happened to be the sole inheritor of the patriarchal fortune, she would be given in marriage to the closest relative on her father's side, even with a brother of the same father, but never one by the same mother, because the genuine blood line was regarded as being only from the side of the mother. In the event of a request for a divorce, the interested woman had to present herself to the Archon, a virtually heard-of procedure. But even if some desperate women dared, the possibilities of being heard were minimal. There is the example of Hipparete, wife of the incorrigible Alcibiades, who at some point, could no longer stand the incongruities of her marriage. The courageous lady took her application to the Archon, but Alcibiades was notified by his friends, and instead of being divorced, caught her and shut her up in the women's section of the house, without anyone objecting.

We have a good deal of information about Athenian women from Xenophon who wrote about a certain Isomachos, about 30 years old, who married an ignorant 15year-old girl and announced her duties to her: to cook, weave, oversee the slaves, avoid waste and above all to be obedient to her husband. Plutarch also spoke of the dignity of Athenian women and the modesty of their dress, as opposed to the athletic young Spartan women whom he referred to contemptuously because they wore short tunics that showed their thighs. But it was Aristophanes who castigated the dynamic women who dared to protest; his Lysistrata demonstrated the opinion of the ancient Athenians about where the power of women lies. In the Ecclesiazouses, he notes sarcastically that everything has always taken place behind closed doors, without disturbing the calm of ignorance and custom.

Perhaps the most succinct indication of the status of women in Athenian society was that of an orator who said that women fall into three categories: courtesans for the delight of the spirit, concubines for pleasure, and wives for the acquisition of legitimate children. It appears that things were so difficult for wives that Solon instituted a law demanding that Athenian men who happened to have property from their wives, visit them in their chambers at least three times a month in order to produce a male heir to carry on the family name. In the Symposium, Socrates noted that men have fewest conversations with their wives, and mentioned the name of a certain Nikiratos who was bound to his wife by true mutual love, a very rare occurrence. Plato, too, suggested that marriage based on love would be better; but this was for the ideal utopian "Republic" and not for the Asty of reality.

The instruments of pleasure, the hetaeres (courtesans), were of two types: the common ones who were called walkers and the special ones, who lived on the support of their rich patrons. Selected from childhood for their physical beauty, they were especially trained to be pleasing. They were the only women who could circulate freely and thus many of the courtesans had the opportunity to receive an education by listening to the various philosophers. In all symposium scenes, we can see young hetaeres. Orchistrides danced and the avlitrides played the flute and chatted with the carefree revellers whom they were entertaining, whose homes were supervised with the zeal of Cerberus by the dignified lady of the house, who always carried bunch of keys at her waist. The homes of the famous hetaeres were open to philosophers and artists, who would meet in a highly intellectual atmosphere; many of these women used their charms for diplomatic or spying purposes: situations as old as society. One famous hetaera was the beautiful, learned Aspasia from Miletus, who so influenced Pericles and so provoked the envy of the Athenians.

Representations on ceramics show us scenes from a very controversial phenomenon, pederasty, which was one outlet for the instincts in a society where women were confined to their apartments and were without interests or education. Another reason was that constant wars kept the male population far from home. The rise in pederasty coincided with the cult of the naked male body which we admire in the young kouroi. But also, in a society where the father, when he was not at war was busy with public matters, it was natural for a boy to seek guidance from some older friend of the same sex, creating a relationship between an experienced person and someone to whom he passes on his knowledge. It is noteworthy that the lovers were always very masculine and never appeared to be feminine or dressed in women's clothes. Plutarch said that when the young man's beard began to grow, that was the end of the relationship, which was socially acceptable.

It was noted earlier that Plato in his Symposium presented a unique analysis of the concept of eros, the beginning and end of which was intellectual unanimity. It is possible that at this very famous supper, Alcibiades in a jest created a jealous scene over Socrates, but he himself, whom Plato called the "image of eros" died in the arms of a famous courtesan Timandra, mother of the equally famous Corinthian Laida. Of the ten people present at the symposium, only two were conscious homosexuals: the host Agathon and his companion Pausanias. As for Socrates, he was presented there as paragon of abstinence, even though he had had too much to drink, and even though he was provoked shamelessly, because in any relationship, what was important was the mind and not the instincts. It seems that pederasty rarely turned into homosexuality. This male companionship was usually limited to teen-age. Moreover, the phenomenon was restricted after the 4th century, when the various presentations on pottery show the great majority of couples to be heterosexual. But let us leave the private life of the Athenians and talk about another social presence in the Polis, that of the slaves.

In order to expand their businesses, metoici bought ever more slaves. Thus a third group of inhabitants of Athens was created: people who had few hopes of improving either their own lot, that of their children or of their children's children. In Attica, slavery had begun in the mythical time of the Pelasgians. The construction workers brought in from elsewhere to build the first Athenian walls annoyed the women and children of the local people at the well from which they all drew water, and for this reason, the angry Athenians took them prisoner and began to use them as servants. According to Plato, true slaves had to be foreigners, mainly prisoners of war; he recommended that his fellow citizens avoid buying enslaved Greeks from other regions. The slave trade flourished in ancient Greece and we wonder how a wise man like Aristotle can refer to these unfortunate creatures as being like wild animals.

The largest slave market in Attica was in Sounion, obviously for the needs of the mines in Lavrion. The slaves who were bought and became metallevomenoi (mine workers) were the most unlucky because few of them lived very long, due to the hard work and appalling conditions. To this day, the Greek word ekmetallefsi means exploitation. Family slaves had a much better fate, even though they too were considered to be a type of property.

When someone bought a slave and took him home, the lady of the house made him sit at the family hearth and the other members of the family sprinkled him with nuts, giving him a name. From that moment on, the slave was an inseparable member of the family and had to participate in sacred rituals. If he had children, they belonged to the family and when he died, they buried him in the family grave. He had no rights, apart from the possibility of appealing to the altar in the Agora, and to request sanctuary if his life was unbearable. But he had to prove his case.

No Athenian citizen or metoicos considered himself to be worthy of respect without a few slaves. It is believed that every home had an average of about 10 slaves, who looked after the household tasks and also accompanied their masters in their public appearances. In wartime, slaves followed on foot, carrying their master's weapons or holding slingshots. In the event that a slave was educated, he served as a teacher of the young people of the family, passing on his knowledge to them and accompanying them to the higher schools and gymnasia. Information has come down to us that quite a few slaves were given their freedom, promoting them to the group of freemen, but the bonds with the family always remained very strong.

Looking at the various inhabitants of Athens, we are often surprised by their way of life and by their values which are frequently incomprehensible to people living today. But we have an enormous obligation to all of them for their contribution to the heritage they left behind: to the wealthy for the mind, to the workers for the art, to the women for maintaining the family, to the slaves for the endless free and creative hours enjoyed by their masters. Pragmatists and poets, merchants and philosophers, warriors and peacemakers, the ancient Athenians cultivated clear thought with their minds which, with boldness of inspiration and freedom of expression, made them the epitome of their age, and the founders of Western civilisation.

Ancient Greece Citizens
Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Check What Are The Top Cooking Books in Last 90 Days Best Cheap Deal!
Check For Cookbooks Best Sellers 2012 Discount OFFER!
Check for Top 100 Most Popular Books People Are Buying Daily Price Update!
Check For 100 New Release & BestSeller Books For Your Collection

To learn more about Athens, the Greek Islands and the rest of Greece take a look at the useful Athens Guide and Greece Guide.

mobile phone watches Low Price Mmf Industries Tamper Evident Cash Bags Cheap Whatman Polycap Tf 150 Ptfe Capsule Filter Discount Cardone 60 3104 Remanufactured Cv Axle

Saturday, December 1, 2012

How To Make An Email Address

You can have an email address for free - in fact you can have several of them if you want. An email address gives you the facility to communicate through the Internet with friends and even strangers. It also gives you a certain measure of anonymity. This has encouraged people to use email addresses for the sort of communication with others that they might never have thought possible through ordinary (snail) mail.

Making an email address is quite simple. Many email service providers such as Hotmail and Yahoo provide the services free of charge. Others like gmail require that you should be introduced by an existing member. This helps everyone in the long run by ensuring that every member is a genuine and respectable person, and prevents misuse.

To create an email in your name, simply visit the site of the email provider. For example, if you want to make an email in Hotmail, go to hotmail.com and select free email. If you want a yahoo mail, go to yahoo.com and select email from there.

How To Make An Email Address

You will be required to give basic details about yourself. In reputed sites you can safely give your personal details, as these are not misused. You will be asked indicate your general preferences and also whether you could be sent information on specific subjects. You can choose items of interest to you. For example, if you are likely to be shopping, you may opt for shopping information to be mailed to you. If you don't want any information, you can refrain from choosing any one.

You can also have an email address that makes use of your own domain name. In this case you may have to spend a small amount of money, but the email address that you get will be unique and bear your individual or your company name. In this case you can choose your user name and a domain name. Domain name is what comes after the user name in the email address, like hotmail.com. In case of your own domain name this can read like yourname@yourdomainname. This could be your company name or your family name or something like that making it unique to you. Usually hosting companies offer multiple usernames with a domain name.

How To Make An Email Address
Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Check What Are The Top Cooking Books in Last 90 Days Best Cheap Deal!
Check For Cookbooks Best Sellers 2012 Discount OFFER!
Check for Top 100 Most Popular Books People Are Buying Daily Price Update!
Check For 100 New Release & BestSeller Books For Your Collection

Did You Find this Credit Repair article Helpful? Would you like find out more LEGAL ways to Repair Your Credit Fast? Then Click Here to visit us over at Legalcreditboost.com!

Get Your Three Free Credit Repair Tips [http://www.legalcreditboost.com/free-credit-repair.html]!

Get Your Three Free Credit Repair Tips....Legalcreditboost.com!

watch cell phone Cheap Whatman Polycap Tf 150 Ptfe Capsule Filter Discount Cardone 60 3104 Remanufactured Cv Axle

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Overcoming Lust As a Christian

"Anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart." To most men, this statement by Jesus seems unrealistic. Looking with lust is so big a part of their lives that to do otherwise seems impossible.

Count me among those who have been perplexed by what Christ said. However, that has changed. I now know that it is possible to avoid adultery in the heart. Here is how this works. Whenever I see a woman, or an image of a woman, which could stir a lustful reaction within me, I immediately stop this from happening. That is, I recoil internally from harnessing my desires and thoughts as a way to generate lust in my heart. This may include a variety of methods, whether by averting my eyes, redirecting my thoughts, switching the channel or turning the page, but the action is always the same. I recoil from sinning in my heart.

Most Christian men appear not to be taking these steps. Rather than obeying Jesus, they hear what He said and then do the opposite. Here are some reasons for this disobedience.

Overcoming Lust As a Christian

Misunderstanding the nature of lust

The way lust works is often misunderstood. Lust is commonly described as being identical to strong sexual desire. However, this description of lust leaves out the key fact that the object of this desire is forbidden to us. Strong sexual desire for one's spouse is not the same as lust for someone else. In fact, lust is more than mere desire because it has within it an element of fulfillment. It is like drinking from a cup, not merely thirsting. Here is a better definition: "Lust is gaining sexual gratification or a 'buzz' from anyone or anything except your wife."

This definition draws the line at the earliest stage of sexual arousal, exactly where Jesus zeroed in. It recognizes that when we lust, we are not passive participants, but rather, actively engaged as we fix our attention on a woman, an image or a fantasy. Unfortunately, even in the Church, many assume that the buzz is not lust and just an unavoidable reaction to temptation. As a result, they consume all available eye candy much like everyone else and treat it as a risk-free source of pleasure, both harmless and fun. This overlooks the fundamental role that lustful looking plays as the earliest and most critical stage of lust. Our minds are able to generate powerful images and fantasies. Looking lustfully, even briefly, harnesses this ability in a way that is unacceptable and sinful. It does not stop there.

Once we have begun, the seed is sown for an ongoing harvest of "blowing it" in ways that are not as easily minimized. Waiting until a later stage before we care to call it sin means missing the obvious. Since we initially brought lust into our lives as a playful pet, we should not be surprised when it grows into a ferocious animal. Rather than being puzzled by our condition, we should heed the words of our Master, retrace our steps, and be aware that lustful looking is the point at which we started to sin. This awareness of when we are engaged in lust is central to any plan for gaining victory. The only effective response to this as to all sin is to immediately repent, confess and receive forgiveness without letting it take root.

Refusing to believe that obedience is possible

Tragically, most men are resigned to the false idea that they are "hardwired" to lust. This causes them to conclude that the standard laid down by Jesus is both unnatural and contrary to how we are designed. However, since we routinely stop ourselves from obtaining a buzz from a family member, such as a sister or daughter, we know that we are not reflexive when it comes to lust. In fact, a simple test of obeying our Savior's commandment as to lustful looking will quickly reveal that we can apply the same sort of discipline whenever we face the temptation to lust. With some practice, each of us can quickly learn to separate visual or mental stimuli from feelings of sexual gratification.

It is not long until we become acutely aware and distressed whenever the "way" we look has crossed the line. Being "in Christ" means we are dead to sin. Stopping ourselves from lusting is a great way to demonstrate this truth for ourselves and to learn that we have already been empowered to turn from sinning if that is what we choose to do. If you have been in a long struggle with lust, the prescription of eliminating lustful looks may seem simplistic and inadequate even though our Savior mandates it. Nonetheless, rejecting a habit that we may have practiced since childhood by bringing our eyes into obedience to Him is an amazingly effective solution.

One reason that some Christians reject this approach is that they view sexual purity as something that God and not they must establish. While they would not condone other sins, like stealing, they somehow have been convinced that lust is different. Unfortunately, victory over sin is not automatic. Rather, as with other sins, this thorny bush must be thoroughly uprooted. Otherwise, it will entangle and prevent us from being fruitful. Far from making us prideful, succeeding in this must cause us to say, "we are unworthy servants, since we have only done our duty." (Luke 17:7)

Obeying the law of God in this regard strengthens us, since it means we are performing in the way we were designed. Our Christian life is meant to be one of exploring new and exciting possibilities and fully utilizing all of our capacities as we walk "in Him." We are unable to flourish in this new life if we persist in the sin of lust, as it will relentlessly occupy our thoughts if given an opening.

Thinking there is a better way

By focusing fully on the lustful look, Jesus did not ignore all the other lustful behaviors in which men regularly engage. Instead, His teaching directs us to where the battle is won. Unfortunately, rather than choosing to permanently close the stable door as He taught, many of us opt to busily chase and corral runaway horses on a daily basis. Both the world and the Church suggest that by sheer determination, we can turn off harmful habits such as viewing pornography, dabbling on the Internet and masturbation.

To this end, they commonly recommend the help of counselors and support groups and various regimens and techniques, like installing Internet filters or avoiding R rated movies for this purpose. Unfortunately, these approaches do not directly address the real issue. Since it is lustful looking that creates our irresistible and ongoing cravings for more, striving to change other behaviors instead is as ineffective as mowing the lawn to get rid of weeds. Getting to the root of the problem requires making a covenant with our eyes to not "look lustfully" as Job described (Job 31:1).

If we eliminate the fuel, the fire will die. Those who fail at reigning in "addictive" behavior should make this their first step. Once lust has been set loose, fighting off its demands by means of our feeble willpower is impossible. That is why we should not borrow from the world's playbook, which assumes that men can curtail their behavior to some degree without fully eliminating lust. This approach is coupled with surprise at those who tumble over the cliff. We are all painfully aware of the many who have shipwrecked their lives because they could not maintain rules of conduct.

The problem has become especially pronounced as the morals of our culture have spiraled steadily downward. Few sexual activities are taboo and almost anything goes if it feels good, especially if it is make-believe. In this environment, establishing a comfort zone with some but not too much lust is problematic. Christians are prone to take a more religious approach. They believe that they can keep lust in check by depending on religious activity. Through increased prayer, Bible reading, fasting, Church attendance and mutual accountability they hope to overwhelm the sin brooding in their hearts.

Certainly there is much to be gained from all of these practices, but they cannot take the place of obeying our Savior's clear directive to eliminate lust. In fact, maintaining outward appearances without zero tolerance in our hearts results in hypocrisy and weakness when we are tempted. Of course, anyone walking in victory will do all he can to avoid temptation. We are the light of the world. Darkness has no power unless we make a place for it in our hearts and minds.

We must not give in to lust regardless of our levels of stress, our spiritual mood, the state of our relationships, or the temptations we face. Jesus delivered His clear-cut standard as part of His Sermon on the Mount. This great message and blueprint for how we are to live, ends with the sobering parable of the man who built his house on a foundation of sand, and a warning. If we hear His teachings and do not obey them, we will collapse when the storms of life envelope us. On the other hand, if we love Him, we will obey His clear call for inner righteousness, build on a stable foundation and be secure in the time of peril.

Not acknowledging the danger and dreadfulness of lust.

Maybe you are unconvinced. Like many men you may think that a little bit of lust is unavoidable, all the while being acutely aware of where too much of it can lead. Heartbreaking tales of broken homes, careers, and lives are sadly familiar. Lust can be a wreaking ball in a man's life, bringing complete devastation. However, none of us expects this to happen to us and usually it doesn't. Instead, the norm is to incorporate lust into our lives at a "safe" level. We keep this carefully tucked away and are quick to turn back whenever it seems to get out of control. Instead of a deadly disease, it more closely resembles a low-grade fever or chronic condition. However, nurturing lust at this level will nevertheless still cause significant damage. First off, sexual impurity inevitably injects duplicity into our lives.

Jesus deplored hypocrisy more than any underlying sin. If we are Christians who harbor sexual fantasies, we are hypocrites- double-minded, unstable men. Most men are said to think about sex once every ten minutes. If we have allowed lust a foothold, we can readily identify with this statistic. Even while we are professing our faith and acting clean on the outside, we are actually "dirty cups" on the inside. Jesus sees inside the heart and knows our thoughts. He demands that we maintain an inner purity that would leave us unafraid to have our thoughts read by anyone.

An even more grievous consequence, however, is that our choosing to lust means breaking the greatest commandment. We are told to love God with all our hearts, our minds and our strength. Giving in to lust hijacks our thoughts and creative energies and displeases our Father who demands the attention we expend as we chase sinful desires. Is it any wonder that our walk with God is uncomfortable and our spiritual lives stunted? Our powerful imaginations and intricate thought lives were designed for God's kingdom. They have a part in His plan. Why turn these faculties over to sin? Once we make room for lust in our lives, it will assert its power unexpectedly, even at those times when we desire to draw close to God. Knowing that we can overcome but choosing not to has ominous implications.

We dare not overlook the rest of what Jesus taught on this subject in Mathew 5. His provocative suggestion that we pluck out our eyes if they cause us to lust is meant to alarm us and makes perfect sense if, in fact, our eyes were the problem. However, we know that our eyes are not the problem. Instead, it is our determination to employ our eyes as a means to lust that is so grotesque in His sight and dangerous for us.

We must keep in mind that the wages of sin is always death. We will reap what we sow. Assuming that we can engage in lust and yet escape the consequences is foolish. Sin always results in death. Our lust may be killing our relationships with our wives or obliterating our testimony before those who know us. It certainly will stifle our prayer life and a closer walk with God. We should not act surprised by the resulting havoc or delude ourselves into thinking that receiving forgiveness is equivalent to obedience. God has not suspended the law of the harvest.

The poster boy for this truth is King David. The sin of lust produced tragedy in his home and in his kingdom. Despite his repentance and determination to obtain a "clean heart", the consequences of his sin continued. Should we hope to escape a similar fate? Turning away from our sin and living our lives in Christ is what we are repeatedly told to do. If we don't, be assured that our sin will find us out.

Lacking clear teaching and models of sexual purity.

Admittedly, this approach is not commonly taught. Yet, treating lust this way is neither radical nor rarely practiced. Questioning men who have a deep walk with God will reveal that they habitually recoil from the lustful look. Typically, they will have adopted this habit early in their Christian walk and are unaware of how this differentiates them from those stumbling around them. As a result, these same men are not passing along practical teaching about lust and the means of overcoming it as Jesus taught causing many to flounder unnecessarily.

Although I paid more than average attention to this issue during fifty years as an active Christian, I still failed to learn these truths. My past ignorance makes me sympathetic to those who are confused and frustrated by how their faith seems powerless in helping them overcome lust. Perhaps those who have been trapped and then escaped are best equipped to help others. This is what David wanted to do. After Nathan the prophet confronted him about his sin, he cried out for a clean heart and hoped that at some point, he could teach "transgressors their ways" so that "sinners will turn back to you" (Ps 51:13).

Those who disciple others after gaining victory can demonstrate that lust is not an unconquerable force, but rather, just one of many sins from which we can be freed. In order to help others, it is essential that we model success and transparency while relying on resources that take a non-compromising approach. Standing with Paul as ones who have been delivered from doing that which we hate can open the door for others. The entire Biblical message relating to sexual sin is a call for uncompromising purity and inner righteousness, qualities the evangelical church has had in short supply.

As the teachings of Jesus and the apostles emphasized, there is a constant temptation to retreat into legalism, which substitutes outward rules in place of obedience and forms a cloak for an unrighteous heart. Observing a slippery set of man-made rules cannot eliminate the lustful look. Righteousness can only be established at a much deeper level where we refuse to fool ourselves, and choose to turn from our wicked ways and thoughts. Only then will the meditations of our hearts become acceptable to Him. Certainly, demonstrating power over sin accomplishes much more than angrily scolding or blaming the decadence of our society. After all, if Christians cannot resist temptation, why shouldn't the world keep catering to them? We may even help turn the putrid tide rising around us once we stop ingesting eye candy, reflexively resist all sexual temptations and deny ourselves illicit gratification.

Being obedient in this regard does not doom us to a life of deprivation. Rather, it frees us to walk in and enjoy the deeper pleasures God has for us. Obedience also opens us up to more of the Sermon on the Mount and its claim on our lives. Our world, including those who embrace competing religious claims, will only notice the difference when we really are different in our innermost being.

Overcoming Lust As a Christian
Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Check What Are The Top Cooking Books in Last 90 Days Best Cheap Deal!
Check For Cookbooks Best Sellers 2012 Discount OFFER!
Check for Top 100 Most Popular Books People Are Buying Daily Price Update!
Check For 100 New Release & BestSeller Books For Your Collection

Author information: I hope that this article has been helpful for you. You do not need to be overcome by lust! For more information on this subject, see my new book called "Overcoming Lust" It is available on Amazon.com. http://www.amazon.com/Overcoming-Lust-Jim-Vander-Spek/product-reviews/1619040522/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

In addition to reading the reviews when you go to that site, please also read the first part of the book for free by double clicking on the cover of the book.

watches mobile phone Low Price Mmf Industries Tamper Evident Cash Bags Cheap Whatman Polycap Tf 150 Ptfe Capsule Filter Discount Cardone 60 3104 Remanufactured Cv Axle

Monday, November 12, 2012

3 Steps to Get an Itch Free Vaginal Shave - Before You Even Pick Up the Razor

The hairless look has become more popular over the last few years and it seems every time a star forgets to wear her panties we get the impression that pubic hair is extinct. There are good reasons to choose the hairless look such as aesthetics and hygiene. When performed right a vaginal shave is a beautiful thing. However razor burn and stubble can really turn into an itchy affair - take a look at these 3 pre shaving steps to guarantee a smooth and itch free shave.

Rushing into things is definitely not the way to go when you want to get the smoothest possible pubic hair shave. Here are the top three mistakes to avoid before you even pick up the razor.

1) Forget the scalpel; it's time for the machete

3 Steps to Get an Itch Free Vaginal Shave - Before You Even Pick Up the Razor

Before you even reach for that razor make sure your pubic hair is prepared. If the hair is longer than 1/4 inch reach for a sharp pair of scissors or a beard trimmer to shorten it. This will make it easier for your razor to cut the hair closely and prevents the blades from clogging up more often than necessary. It's best to perform this step when the hair is dry. At this point precision isn't really necessary. You just want to get the hair as short as possible while taking care that you don't cut yourself with the scissors or clippers.

2) Don't forget to steam it up

One of the reasons a vaginal shave isn't nearly as close as it could be is that you didn't steam up your pubic region enough. Washing the area with hot water before you begin shaving is a good way to avoid that nasty stubble. If you are like me and shave your vagina in the shower this part is easy but it will also work while standing in front of a sink using a wash cloth. In that case soak the washcloth and wring it out lightly. Lay it on your pubic region to heat it up. The water should be quite hot so the hair gets softened and your pores open. The opening of the pores will result in hair follicles moving further out allowing the razor to cut the hair closer to the root.

3) Don't start without applying lube

Dragging a razor across sensitive skin like that in your pubic region is murder on skin. The sharp blades wick moisture away and irritate the skin. One way to avoid that is to use a good pre-shaving oil. The oil forms a protective layer on your skin and coats your pubic hair to allow the razor to glide over the skin easier. Apply the oil by rubbing a light coating into your skin before applying any other shaving foams or gels.

These are the three major pre shaving tips when going for that ultra smooth, non irritated vaginal shave. Making sure you don't rush into shaving is half the battle. There is a reason facial shaves in barber shops are a lengthy affair - because the amazingly close shave you get are worth it. Take a few minutes to get things just right and you will avoid that itchy feeling after you shave.

3 Steps to Get an Itch Free Vaginal Shave - Before You Even Pick Up the Razor
Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Check What Are The Top Cooking Books in Last 90 Days Best Cheap Deal!
Check For Cookbooks Best Sellers 2012 Discount OFFER!
Check for Top 100 Most Popular Books People Are Buying Daily Price Update!
Check For 100 New Release & BestSeller Books For Your Collection

Annie Greentree is a staff writer for Newf Brand Bath & Bodycare. Newf Brand offers all natural shaving products such as Pre-Shaving Oil, Organic Shaving Jelly and Aftershave Mist.
Get a perfect shave every time with Newf Brand's Venereous Shaving trio. Or get ideas for crazy pubic hair designs in our new Pubic Hair Templates EBook.

watches mobile phone Discounted Genuine Gm Parts 20793342 Driver Side Front Discount Cardone 60 3104 Remanufactured Cv Axle

Monday, November 5, 2012

Creed Perfume - Top 5 Creed Perfumes That Will Make a Ordinary Woman Feel Like a Hollywood Star

Founded in 1760, Paris-based perfume house Creed is the only privately owned luxury fragrance company in existence, having been handed down through the Creed family over the centuries. Remarkably, Creed has provided fragrance for more than ten royal houses and the public for 250 years and is one of the hundred oldest family businesses in the world. Creed is nowadays headed by the sixth generation perfumer Olivier Creed who works alongside his son Erwin, 29 who will one day take over the family company.

Creed's strict high standards, both in the creation of their fragrances and customer service, is one of the reasons for its enormous following which includes Hollywood actresses, royalty and leaders in politics, sport and the arts as well as its worldwide army of fans, some of whom have remained loyal to Creed for their entire lives.

With over 30 women fragrances to choose from, selecting your favourite Creed perfume can be a wonderful process. You can be sure that each one is made using the processes of hand maceration and filtrations, with a strong emphasis on natural ingredients. The following five Creed perfumes are consistently named as favorites of Creed devotees and new users alike.

Creed Perfume - Top 5 Creed Perfumes That Will Make a Ordinary Woman Feel Like a Hollywood Star

Spring Flower by Creed

Spring Flower was created in 1950 and remains a popular fragrance for women of all ages. Its notes of jasmine, peach, apple, musk, melon, rose, ambergris combine to produce a truly feminine, flowery scent, which many users say reminds them of lilies.

Fleurissimo by Creed

Fleurissimo is an elegant, floral scent with notes of Bulgarian rose, violet, tuberose and Florentine iris. Apparently a favourite of Princess Grace of Monaco after it was created for her wedding to Prince Ranier in 1972, Fleurissimo is suited to the mature woman who like a vibrant fragrance. Testers comment on its staying power and sophisticated scent.

Fantasia De Fleurs

Fantasia De Fleurs by Creed is a supremely romantic fragrance, which was actually first created in 1862 for the beautiful royal legend Empress Elisabeth of Austria-Hungary. Reintroduced in 1983. Its rich, full floral bouquet includes bulgarian rose, iris and amber and is recommended for women of all ages; despite its history wearers in their 20s and 30s appear to love its elegance and hint of spice.

Love In White by Creed

Launched by Creed in 2005, Love in White has notes of Orange Blossom, Bulgarian Rose, Rice Husk, Magnolia, Sandalwood, Absolute, Vanilla, Ambergris. Reviewers class it as a lingering fragrance which is clean and crisp yet has an exotic combination of its citrus and floral notes. Similarities to Spring Flower are often noted, although Love in White seems to be more suitable to the more mature woman.

Acqua Florentina

This magnificent fragrance by Creed is the perfume house latest creation. Introduced in 2009, it is a fragrance for the modern woman while taking inspiration from 15th century Florence and Renaissance art. Notes of Indian sandalwood, pink carnations, bergamot orange and greenage plum combine to produce this ethereal yet long-lasting scent. Users praise its soft, airy scent and balance of sweetness and herbage, and it seems to be popular with women of all ages.

Enjoy your Creed fragrance and feel like a Hollywood star!

Creed Perfume - Top 5 Creed Perfumes That Will Make a Ordinary Woman Feel Like a Hollywood Star
Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Check What Are The Top Cooking Books in Last 90 Days Best Cheap Deal!
Check For Cookbooks Best Sellers 2012 Discount OFFER!
Check for Top 100 Most Popular Books People Are Buying Daily Price Update!
Check For 100 New Release & BestSeller Books For Your Collection

Click Here Now! for more information and reviews on your favorite Creed Perfume or Creed Cologne

mobile phone watches Hot Deals Tektronix Power Supply 18V 5A 90W Cheap Dispenser Kit For Liquid Detergent Buy Shure Pg14 Pg30 Wireless Headset System K7

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Your Success Guide - Getting Started With Internet Marketing

Making money online has never been easier with the development of software tools and outsourcing options available to you. It is now feasible to start a new business on the web from the ground up for very little cost. This of course does not guarantee any success but compared with starting a new offline business, the online option is far easier, cheaper and beneficial.

Here are some tips to start with if you are considering a web business but are not sure where to start.

1. Niche Research

Your Success Guide - Getting Started With Internet Marketing

Most people do not know where to start when it comes to finding a niche. If you do not have a fixed idea of what you are selling you should take a look at sites like eBay and Amazon and see what people are buying. If people are purchasing products then you have a good starting point.

2. Affiliate Marketing

An easy point of access is to become an affiliate. You can get started immediately after signing up and you can promote a product which has already been created and has a proven track record. This bypasses the product creation process and means you can earn commissions straight away.

3. Create a Product

In the longer term then you may decide to create a product. If you have been selling as an affiliate you should by now understand the market and what customers want. You will also now what converts well. This is a great start and can guide you when designing a product. You can then recruit your own affiliates to do the selling for you.

This is the broad model that a huge number of internet marketers take and can prove to be very lucrative if followed through correctly.

Your Success Guide - Getting Started With Internet Marketing
Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Check What Are The Top Cooking Books in Last 90 Days Best Cheap Deal!
Check For Cookbooks Best Sellers 2012 Discount OFFER!
Check for Top 100 Most Popular Books People Are Buying Daily Price Update!
Check For 100 New Release & BestSeller Books For Your Collection

Rich Williams is an Internet Marketing teacher and innovator. You can get a FREE copy of his report:

"Affiliate Tactics Manual" and learn 2 simple tactics to bank some quick cash!

Get the report by visiting his website [http://www.IMAffiliateLab.com]

Also head over to http://www.MarketQuake.net and check out his blog.

watches mobile phone Cheap Maxell Cleaning Tape Sdlt 1 S4 Cheap Dispenser Kit For Liquid Detergent

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Proactive Skin Care - Why Only the Most Effective All Natural Anti Aging Products Are a Must!

Did you know that in order to avoid the onset of lines and wrinkles in your skin, proactive skin care using only the most effective all natural anti aging products is an absolute must? Too often people end up using anti aging skin care formulas only after they are no longer able to cover up the fact that they are beginning to look older. Then they tend to treat the problem by using products that are less than effective.


Direct Dealer Stores Zone
24 Hrs Best Seller Category
New Tags Get Cheapest Price Shopping
Benefit Buy Direct Directory
Inter Brand Search
My Shopping Centre
Online store Review Directory
Only New Release Products

You can prevent lines and wrinkles from ever developing by applying compounds to your skin that counteract the supposedly inevitable decline in your collagen and elastin production. These products can work for you at no matter what stage of the aging process your skin is at. The introduction of large amounts of fresh connective tissue will make a tremendous difference both the way your skin looks, and feels.

Most companies advertise proactive skin care formulas for preventing wrinkle, but most do not feature the correct ingredients for turning the loss of tissue around. The bulk of the anti aging formulas on the market will contain animal derived collagen and elastin, meant to be introduced by absorbing them into the skin. These compounds are supposed to mesh with your own tissue, and help smooth out your wrinkles.

Proactive Skin Care - Why Only the Most Effective All Natural Anti Aging Products Are a Must!

Adding new foreign connective tissues to what you have remaining is not the same thing as boosting the creation of your own collagen and elastin. All this method of eliminating lines and wrinkles in the skin would do is add tissue that would almost immediately be rejected, and broken down. It is all a moot point anyway, because your skin is incapable of absorbing collagen and elastin proteins.

These compounds are too molecularly dense to make absorbing them possible, so the only way that foreign tissue can be added to your own is through clinical injections that place the tissue deep into the skin. Of course, even the tissue injected into the skin will quickly begin to deteriorate, because the body does not readily accept animal proteins. Here are some proactive skin care compounds that will truly change the way you look.

There is a line of anti aging formulas on the market that feature a protein based ingredient called Cynergy TK, and it contains a pair of keratin protein chains so potent that they have bee given their own name. Functional Keratin is almost identical to the basic protein found in human skin, which makes this ingredient the perfect catalyst for stimulating the increased production of your collagen and elastin.

The proactive skin care formula that brings you Cynergy TK with Functional Keratin, offers you another ingredient for further enhancing the increase in tissue that Functional Keratin sparks. Phytessence Wakame kelp extract attacks the hyaluronidase enzyme that breaks down the hyaluronic acid in your skin. Without ample hyaluronic acid the collagen and elastin in your skin lose their "glue", and are therefore ineffective.

Make no mistake about it. When it comes to proactive skin care the all natural formulas with this particular set of ingredients are unmatched in the results that they are capable of producing.

Proactive Skin Care - Why Only the Most Effective All Natural Anti Aging Products Are a Must!

To learn more about vitamins for healthy skin, and other incredible natural substances for natural healthy skin care, visit my website today.

Laurel is a long time user and passionate advocate of natural skin care products. Visit her site now to discover cutting edge, anti-aging skin care products she recommends after extensive research: http://www.beautiful-skin-site.com.

watch cell phone Cheap Maxell Cleaning Tape Sdlt 1 S4 Buy Shure Pg14 Pg30 Wireless Headset System K7

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Best Facial Cream For Frown Lines - Discover Natural Way to Remove Frown Lines Without Botox

Are you looking for the best facial cream for frown lines? Are looking for something that is effective and safe on your body? Then read on to find out how to remove frown lines without Botox.


Direct Dealer Stores Zone
24 Hrs Best Seller Category
New Tags Get Cheapest Price Shopping
Benefit Buy Direct Directory
Inter Brand Search
My Shopping Centre
Online store Review Directory
Only New Release Products

Finding the best facial cream for frown lines is easy if you know what to look for; it is unfortunately that many consumers do not do any research before buying skin care products. Majority of people rely on advertisements and what is popular; what they do not know is that most of the adverts present false claims and popularity does not mean efficiency. You find out that the product do not deliver on its promises only after you must have bought and used it.

I too have been a victim of such false claims; but, that have change because, I no longer buy products based on popularity or advertisements. I focus on what is really important; I focus on the ingredients because the potency of any skin cream is determined by the ingredients it contains.

Best Facial Cream For Frown Lines - Discover Natural Way to Remove Frown Lines Without Botox

First, I do not use products that contain synthetic ingredients/chemicals because they are harmful to the body; they also dry out the skin, causing irritation and allergic reactions. Hence, the best facial cream for frown lines is found among natural brands.

Lines and wrinkles are basically caused by loss of collagen and elastin; hence, the best facial cream for frown lines should boost collagen and elastin in your body. However, using products that contain these two proteins will not help get rid of your wrinkles; these vital substances cannot be absorbed into your body if applied topically because the keratin molecules in them are too big to pass through the pores of your skin.

You may have noticed that most of the popular anti-wrinkle creams contain collagen or elastin as ingredient; they are just capitalizing on the ignorance of consumers. The best facial cream for frown lines should contain ingredients that enhance natural production of the two proteins in your body.

Cynergy TK, which is an active keratin developed by an upcoming New Zealand company is proven to do just that. Not only does Cynergy TK stimulate collagen and elastin production, it also increases the creation of new cells in your body, thereby making your skin to look rejuvenated and younger. It helps to firm up your skin as well as get rid of wrinkles and skin discolorations like age spots.

Other natural ingredients that the best facial cream for frown line should contain include Nano-lipobelle HEQ10 and plant oils like Babassu, Maracuja and Grapeseed oil. For more information on how to make your skin look younger and flawless, visit my website.

Discover the best facial cream for frown lines today.

Best Facial Cream For Frown Lines - Discover Natural Way to Remove Frown Lines Without Botox

Do you want to get rid of sagging skin, remove wrinkles, age spots and de-age your skin? Visit my website http://www.healthy-and-clear-skin-site.com to learn the truth the big brand names do not want you to know and discover safe and effective natural skin care products that will make your skin look healthy, firm, smooth, flawless, younger and beautiful.

Caroline Igwe is an avid researcher on skincare and she enjoys sharing information about her research findings.

watch mobile phone Discount Cardone 60 3104 Remanufactured Cv Axle

Sunday, August 26, 2012

The United States Mandatory Rule of Exclusion Is Due For a Make-Over: Discretionary Approach? Part 1

Introduction: The United States Exclusionary Rule

Contemporary constitutional provisions oftentimes integrate explicit boundaries or restrictions on the investigatory power of the police. These constitutional stipulations typically supplement guarantees aimed at ensuring fair standards in the criminal process, for those detained or charged with a crime (En 1) Most of these documents echo themes first articulated in the United States' Bill of Rights (En 2) and reiterated centuries later in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (En 3.)

Related Best Seller Product Reviews :
Buy Cheap Black Decker D2030 Auto Off Advantage
Buy New Black Decker D2030 Auto Off Advantage
Cheap Refurb Breville BJE200XL Fountain 700 Watt Extractor
Cheap Resale Breville BJE200XL Fountain 700 Watt Extractor
Cheap Save EatSmart Precision Digital Kitchen Silver
Cheap New EatSmart Precision Digital Kitchen Silver
Cheap Acu Rite Indoor Humidity Monitor
Best Price Acu Rite Indoor Humidity Monitor
Cheap Frigidaire FRA052XT7 000 BTU Window Conditioner
Discount Frigidaire FRA052XT7 000 BTU Window Conditioner
Discounted Thermos Nissan Intak Hydration Bottle
Hot Sale Thermos Nissan Intak Hydration Bottle
Hot Offer Keurig Storage Drawer Coffee Holder
On Sale Keurig Storage Drawer Coffee Holder
Order Resale Victor M230 Ultimate Flea Trap
Order Save Victor M230 Ultimate Flea Trap
Order Deal Maytex Mildew Shower Curtain Liner
Order Best Maytex Mildew Shower Curtain Liner
Best Seller PUR 2 Stage Pitcher Replacement Filter
Purchase PUR 2 Stage Pitcher Replacement Filter

These recent global developments are not surprising. The potential for tyranny is constant, even in modern societies. Throughout history, oppressive regimes have used their unlimited police powers to search the homes of political opponents, to detain dissidents without trial, to conduct "show trials" for political purposes, or to subject opponents to torture or other extreme forms of punishment. Limitless police powers take the greatest toll on a society's most vulnerable members: the young, the homeless, the poor, racial or ethnic minorities, and political dissidents. It must be recognized, however, that in modern society, crime is one of the greatest threats to individual safety. If a society is so crime ridden that its members live in a perpetual state of fear, the niceties of constitutional liberty may seem unimportant to the populace. Fear of crime and criminals provokes a demand for government action. These two competing concerns are the basis surrounding the idea of the Exclusionary Rule. It all begins when the police excesses yield inculpatory evidence against a criminal accused. When evidence has been obtained in contravention of the Constitution, two opposing concerns meet: society's interest in seeing that persons guilty of crime are detected, prosecuted, convicted and punished, and a concurrent societal interest in safeguarding individual liberties against unlawful or unconstitutional police conduct. (Dawson, The Exclusion of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence.)

The United States Mandatory Rule of Exclusion Is Due For a Make-Over: Discretionary Approach? Part 1

In the United States, these differing principles are presently resolved in favor of individual liberty, through the use of the exclusionary rule.(EN6) This rule, created my case-law, is anything but "resolved." Since its creation, the rule has led to extensive litigation and a never-ending flow of academic commentary. The debate surrounding the issue has continued unabated in the United States for almost one hundred years.

The following dissertation will provide an in-depth look into the mandatory or automatic exclusionary rule doctrine of the United States. The following piece will present a detailed elucidation of the exclusionary rule as it stands today, as well as the history leading up to its inception together with the underlying reasons for its formulation. Furthermore, the benefits and detriments of the doctrine will be discussed, providing the views of both the proponents and opponents of the rule as well as an inquiry into the question of whether or not this Exclusionary Rule is really doing the job it was intended to do, specifically to deter future illegal police conduct. An investigation into the question of whether or not there needs to be other underlying policy reasons, aside from the deterrence of police misconduct rationale, for the application of the Exclusionary Rule, will also be conducted.

The piece will further explore beyond the borders of the United States and into Canada to observe how the idea of suppressing evidence obtained in violation of the individual's rights, is applied abroad. The piece will discuss differences in the application of the mandatory exclusionary rule in the United States and the discretionary exclusionary rule in Canada and will compare and contrast policy reasons underlying their respective application of evidence suppression rules.

The dissertation will argue for the codification of the current mandatory or automatic exclusionary rule doctrine of the United States to a discretionary exclusionary doctrine which is currently applied in Canada. Such an amendment will endow the United States with benefits far beyond the ones the current exclusionary rule provides, such as bequeathing remedies to the individuals whose rights have been violated as well as appropriate penalties for the violating conduct of the police.

The definition of the United States mandatory exclusionary rule

In order to deeply delve in to the critique of the Exclusionary Rule, it is vital to understand its definition, characteristics, and circumstances in which it is applied. In legal proceedings, the exclusionary rule prohibits the use of any evidence obtained in contravention of the U.S. Constitution. The rule is invoked when government authorities seize evidence in violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unlawful searches and seizures. Evidence may be illegally obtained when government officials do not have a warrant to search an individual's premises or the warrant is defective. Law enforcement officers may also lack sufficient probable cause to arrest a person. In addition, the courts will automatically invoke the exclusionary rule when they find a violation of an individual's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or a violation of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Courts often refer to evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment as "tainted" or "the fruit of a poisonous tree." A criminal defendant who claims an unreasonable search and seizure is usually allowed to make the claims in a suppression hearing that is conducted before the trial. At this hearing the judge must determine what evidence will be suppressed, or excluded from trial.

This automatic exclusionary rule has 3 elements. First, there must be an illegal action by a police officer, or by someone acting as n agent of the police. Second, there must be evidence secured. The third element states that there must be a casual connection between the illegal action and the evidence secured. If the defense believes such an offense has taken place, the defense lawyer may file a motion to suppress the evidence. It is then up to the prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the evidence was collected without violating the defendant's Fourth amendment rights. If the prosecution fails to prove this case, the evidence will automatically be suppressed from the case-in-chief, and absolutely no consideration will be given to the probative value of that evidence, even if it may be the only evidence out there. With time, the courts, after realizing the broad scope of this mandatory rule, began to narrow its application. There are now three exceptions to the exclusionary rule. In these cases, while the situation meets the three elements needed to trigger the exclusionary rule, the evidence will be allowed anyway. The first exception is the Independent Source Doctrine. This exception was created in the Supreme Court case of Segura and Colon v U.S in 1984. In this situation, evidence is seized in two different physical ways. One of them is illegal, but the second seizure of the same evidence is legal. For example, if one were to photo-copy financial records without a warrant of someone suspected of embezzlement, but then later returned with a warrant and re-copied the information, that evidence would be allowed. The second exception is the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine. The case that added this exception was Nix vs. Williams, in 1984. This exception states that the evidence is seized in two different ways, but only one being physical. The evidence is secured physically by illegal means, but there is also a hypothetical seizure of the evidence that would not have been illegal. For example, if a dead body was buried, and the police violated a defendant's rights in order to force him to tell where the body was, this would be the illegal physical seizure. However, if there was a search for the body in progress that would have eventually crossed the area where the body was to be found, this would be the hypothetical seizure. The prosecution must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the evidence would have been located by this hypothetical means had it not been sized illegally. The third and final exception is that of Good Faith, which was added in the Supreme Court cases of U.S. vs. Leon and Mass. vs. Sheppard, both in 1984. In this case, a police officer receives a warrant from a magistrate and acts on it to seize evidence. However, there may have been an error in allowing the police officer to have the warrant. Since the point of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct, and there would have been no misconduct by a police officer, the evidence would not be suppressed.

History of the rule

Between 1791 and 1914, the constitutionally guaranteed right of all citizens to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures remained virtually un-enforced by American courts. The Fourth Amendment had the words that warned the government not to engage in unreasonable searches and seizures, but lacked any means to restrain government officials from violating citizens' Fourth Amendment rights. Not until 1914 in Weeks v. United States, [FN4] did the U.S. Supreme Court recognize that if evidence can be illegally obtained "and used in evidence against a citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the Fourth Amendment... is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the Constitution." [] Thus, the United States faced the problem that, while the Fourth Amendment guaranteed protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, the judicial system, as the primary protector of constitutional rights, did nothing to deter or punish unreasonable searches and seizures. To give value to the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Weeks, held that the Federal government and its agencies could not use illegally obtained evidence against the accused at trial. In other words, the Court established an exclusionary rule that illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible at trial and applied it only to the Federal courts. [FN6] The Court propounded two central rationales for its adoption of the Exclusionary Rule. First, there was the need to protect citizens' Fourth Amendment rights by deterring government conduct that violated those rights. [FN7] Second, there was the need to preserve the integrity of the judicial system by refusing to sanction illegal police conduct: "To sanction such proceedings [where illegally obtained evidence is admitted] would be to affirm by judicial decision a manifest neglect if not an open defiance of the prohibitions of the Constitution, intended for the protection of the people against such unauthorized action." [FN8] While Weeks represented a significant development in enforcing Fourth Amendment rights, its limitation to federal courts greatly restricted the Rule's ability to enforce those rights.

Four decades later, in Mapp v. Ohio, [FN9] three police officers invaded Dollree Mapp's home. The officers knocked on her door and demanded entry. They suspected that someone they wanted to question was hiding inside. Mapp consulted her lawyer and refused to admit the officers. Later that day, four or more officers arrived at the home, which was still under surveillance by the original officers. The officers then finally and forcibly entered Mapp's home. About that time, Mapp's lawyer arrived at the home but was not permitted to see his client or to enter her house. Confronting the officers in her home, Mapp demanded to see their search warrant. After Mapp grabbed the purported warrant and placed it in her bosom, the officers forcibly recovered it from her. Mapp's arms were grabbed, twisted, forced into handcuffs, and she was dragged to her bedroom where she was forced to remain. The officers searched the entire floor, including Mapp's bedroom and the basement of her home. The officers found incriminating obscene materials and she was convicted of possession. Whether the officers had secured a warrant to search Mapp's home was subject to "considerable doubt," and no such warrant was produced at any subsequent legal proceeding. [FN10] Given the particularly egregious nature of the police misconduct, the Supreme Court felt compelled to bestow teeth to the Fourth Amendment by making the Exclusionary Rule, first enunciated in Weeks, applicable to the states.

In holding the Exclusionary Rule applicable to both state and federal courts, the Mapp Court decided to "close the only courtroom door remaining open to evidence secured by official lawlessness in flagrant abuse of that basic right, reserved to all persons as a specific guarantee against that very same unlawful conduct." [FN11] As in Weeks, the Mapp Court reiterated that without the Exclusionary Rule, the use of illegally obtained evidence to convict criminal defendants "tends to destroy the entire system of constitutional restraints on which the liberties of the people rest." [FN12]

Mapp reiterated the dual rationales enunciated in Weeks: protection of citizens' Fourth Amendment rights, and preservation of judicial integrity. [FN13] These dual rationales actually comprise only one justification behind The Exclusionary Rule: the recognition that allowing unrestricted use of illegally obtained evidence will not discourage violation of the constitutionally protected right.

Competing Concerns regarding the Exclusionary Rule in the United States

The Exclusionary Rule is certainly one of those controversial doctrines that caries with it its own share of proponents as well as detractors. When evidence has been obtained in contravention of the Constitution, the two opposing concerns meet: society's interest in seeing that persons guilty of crime are detected, prosecuted, convicted and punished, and a concurrent societal interest in safeguarding individual liberties against unlawful or unconstitutional police conduct. [FN5]. In the United States, these differing principles are presently resolved in favor of individual liberty, through the use of the exclusionary rule. [FN6] But the status of the American exclusionary rule is anything but "resolved." Since its creation, the rule has led to extensive litigation and a never-ending flow of academic commentary. The debate surrounding the issue has continued unabated in the United States for almost one hundred years.

As aforementioned, generally, two opposing viewpoints have emerged from all the debate concerning the exclusionary rule. There are those who want to abolish the exclusionary rule and those who wish to retain it. The critics of the rule are evidently more concerned with the idea of ensuring that the guilty are punished and kept in prisons than the view of making sure the constitutional rights and liberties of the people are kept intact. The proponents, contrary to the critics, are obviously more interested in making sure that the liberties of the people are protected, even though that may come at a price of letting the guilty go free. Opponents of the exclusionary rule argue that this extreme remedy is not required by the Constitution. They claim the rule is merely judicially created, fashioned to protect constitutional rights by deterring future police illegality. Critics complain that the exclusionary rule is not an effective deterrent and exacts a huge toll in lost convictions. According to critics, the rule's costs outweigh its negligible benefits. Therefore, it is invariably argued, the exclusionary rule should be replaced with some more effective and less costly alternative remedy.

In stark contrast, proponents of the exclusionary rule insist that it is mandated by the Constitution and serves as an effective deterrent. They argue that those who criticize its deterrent value fail to recognize that the rule is necessary to preserve judicial integrity and compensate individual victims of police illegality. Proponents complain that the rule's detractors mask a dissatisfaction with substantive constitutional guarantees, under an attack on the exclusionary remedy. If law enforcement obeys the constitutional rules, as they should, then there would be no illegally obtained evidence to be excluded. According to proponents, this remedy is matchless. No other device is equally capable of safeguarding the Constitution's guarantees in a criminal context.

The debate surrounding the exclusionary rule has been ongoing in the United States since the Weeks decision. Arguably, the historical debate is capable of being encapsulated into seven general criticisms and responses:

1) Criticism--The criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered. [FN123]

Response--Criminals do not go free because the constable blundered, but rather because official compliance with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment makes it more difficult to catch criminals. It is not the exclusionary rule but the Fourth Amendment which imposes a cost in lost convictions. [FN124]

2) Criticism--The exclusionary rule serves to handcuff the police in their legitimate and important effort to enforce the criminal law. [FN125]

Response--It is the constitutional rule, not the exclusionary sanction, which imposes limits on the operation of the police. If the police abide by the Constitution, there would be no evidence to exclude. The exclusionary rule, by definition, operates only after incriminating evidence has been obtained and flaunts before us the costs we must pay for constitutional safeguards. [FN126]

3) Criticism--The exclusionary rule does not provide a remedy for innocent persons who are the victims of unconstitutional conduct. The rule exclusively serves to benefit the guilty. [FN127]

Response--The Fourth Amendment protects everyone against unreasonable searches and seizures. The exclusionary rule inures to the benefit of all by decreasing the likelihood that anyone, "innocent" or "guilty," will be subjected to an unconstitutional search or seizure. In this fashion, individual liberty is benefited on a general level by the rule.

Criticism--Suppression motions, in which defendants seek the benefit of the exclusionary rule, unnecessarily shift the focus of the trial away from the defendants' guilt or innocence. These hearings are costly and distract judges from other important matters. Finally, the court is not the proper forum to discipline police officers for their unconstitutional activities.

Response--Courts should be preoccupied with the manner in which evidence has been obtained, otherwise the Constitution's guarantees would be rendered meaningless. It is the courts that must assume the role of being the final arbiters of individual rights. Absent such judicial scrutiny, constitutional violations would go unnoticed. Similarly, without continual judicial review, the Constitution's guarantees would remain unarticulated and rarely defined. The Constitution would only be expounded in rare actions for assault, trespass and false imprisonment, and prosecutions for resisting arrest or obstructing the police in the execution of their duty. [FN130]

6) Criticism--The exclusionary rule confers a disproportionate benefit on a defendant. A relatively minor violation of the Constitution results in the exclusion of evidence and necessitates that a guilty defendant go free. This windfall is contrary to the idea of proportionality that is essential to the concept of justice.

Response--This criticism is only significant if one conceives the purpose of the rule to be compensation of the individual victim. [FN132] If the compensation rationale is used, however, the criticism remains inaccurate. A number of exceptions to the exclusionary rule have been created to ensure that all that is excluded is the evidence the police would not have found had they abided by the Constitution. The exclusionary rule does not confer immunity on a defendant against future prosecution; it simply restores him to the position he would have occupied had his constitutional rights not been violated.

Criticism--The exclusionary rule in the United States is anomalous; other democratic nations do not employ an exclusionary rule and they are arguably as free as the United States. [FN134]

Response--The United States is not alone in employing an exclusionary rule; a number of nations use exclusion of evidence as a means to safeguard individual rights. For instance, England, Scotland, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Germany and France all have some form of an exclusionary rule.

Problems with the United States mandatory exclusionary rule

Looking at the above arguments, it is clear that the opponents and proponents are completely at opposite sides of the spectrum in deciding an issue which appears to have two possible conclusions: a) to continue maintaining the current exclusionary rule of the United States or b) to abolish it altogether. However, careful consideration and research into this particular sphere can lead one to ask the question of whether or not there is a third alternative, one which would sit between automatic exclusion and admissibility of evidence. Perhaps this third approach would alleviate some of the competing concerns regarding the exclusionary rule currently implemented in the United States. However, prior to making an endeavor to formulate this third possible choice, it is vital to point out some of the quandaries with the current mandatory exclusionary rule.

The mandatory aspect is problematic

As stated above, the United States exclusionary rule is one of mandatory or automatic exclusion. This means that, even highly probative evidence will be suppressed if the police seize it illegally. Proponents of an exclusionary rule must concede that the costs of such a rule occasionally seem too harsh. If a defendant charged with murder is released because a relatively minor and unintended violation of his rights disclosed essential evidence, then it is difficult to deny that the rule occasionally exacts too high a price. The problem with the American exclusionary rule is that it is unable to effectively cope with such exceptional cases. Generally, the rule demands that evidence be excluded regardless of society's competing interest in not having a dangerous criminal released back into the community. This is a major problem.

The mandatory exclusionary rule does not do its job

What is the ob of the exclusionary rule? What was the chief purpose for its establishment in the United States? Mapp reiterated the dual rationales enunciated in Weeks: protection of citizens' Fourth Amendment rights, and preservation of judicial integrity. [FN13] These dual rationales actually comprise only one justification behind The Exclusionary Rule: the recognition that allowing unrestricted use of illegally obtained evidence will not discourage violation of the constitutionally protected right. It is evident that the true aim of the Exclusionary Rule is to deter future police violation of constitutionally protected rights. Specifically, excluding evidence illegally obtained will chasten the government official to the extent that he or she will not engage in similar conduct in the future. It is implicit that if the offending government official would not be deterred from future illegality, then application of the Rule would be inappropriate. Indeed, in a series of cases after Mapp, the Supreme Court held the Rule's application inappropriate where the exclusion would not deter future Fourth Amendment violations. In United States v. Calandra, [FN14] the Court declined to allow grand jury witnesses to refuse to answer questions based upon evidence illegally seized because the "incremental deterrent effect which might be achieved by extending the rule to grand jury proceedings is uncertain at best." [FN15] In United States v. Janis, [FN16] the Court permitted the use of evidence seized illegally by state officials in federal civil proceedings because the illegal conduct was not likely to be deterred by exclusion in that setting. [FN17] The Court cited two factors which made exclusion unnecessary *49in the Janis case. [FN18] First, since the evidence was suppressed in the state criminal trial, the officer had already been "punished" for violating the Fourth Amendment. [FN19] Second, since the evidence was also excludable at the federal criminal trial, the entire criminal enforcement process, which was the concern and duty of these officers, would be frustrated by the exclusion of the evidence in both proceedings. [FN20] Thus, the Exclusionary Rule accomplished its intended goal of deterrence in the criminal courts, and any further possible deterrent effect that exclusion from federal civil proceedings might cause would be outweighed by the societal costs imposed by the exclusion. [FN21] More recently, in United States v. Leon, [FN22] the Court found the Rule's application inapplicable when police officers reasonably relied on a search warrant. [FN23] Since the constitutional error in Leon was made by the magistrate in approving the search warrant, there was no police illegality and hence nothing to deter. [FN24] Furthermore, the Court held that suppression of evidence obtained pursuant to a warrant should be ordered only on a case-by-case basis and only in those unusual cases in which exclusion will further the purposes of the Exclusionary Rule. [FN25] Leon is a powerful mandate holding that judges should not exclude evidence unless exclusion would deter future illegal police conduct.

Therefore, it is beyond dispute that the Exclusionary Rule, and the focus of modern Supreme Court opinions construing the Exclusionary Rule, is the preservation of our constitutional rights through the deterrence of future police misconduct that violates those rights.

So is the exclusionary rule really deterring unconstitutional police seizure of evidence? For the Exclusionary Rule to deter future police misconduct, the exclusion of the evidence must be communicated to the offending officer, the officer must learn why it was excluded, and he or she must be provided with some incentive to improve his or her future performance. *55 Absent these steps, is there motivation for a police officer to conform his or her conduct to the dictates of the Fourth Amendment?

Deterrence from wrongful conduct will only occur if notice of that conduct is effectively communicated to the wrongdoer. However, despite this apparent common sense notion, the Exclusionary Rule contains no provision for any police "education." Indeed, whether the police officer who has violated a defendant's constitutional rights will ever learn that he or she has committed such a violation is, at best, uncertain. [FN48] For example, the most direct educational effect will be felt by those officers who attend the suppression hearing (perhaps because they must present evidence of their conduct) and actually hear the court's ruling on the motion. Even then, the basis of the ruling may not be clear to the officer, or she may feel that the result was the product of a misguided or even ill-conceived system, rather than the result of her misconduct. In any case, the offending officer often does not attend the suppression hearing, so no direct lesson is possible. Whether the police officer is made aware of his or her misconduct will then depend upon how effectively the prosecutor or police supervisors communicate with the involved officers. Thus any educational effect of the Exclusionary Rule is unpredictable and often left completely to chance. [FN49]

An additional impediment to the educational aspect of deterrence of Fourth Amendment violations lies in the failure to file many potential prosecutions that result from constitutionally flawed investigations. A prosecutor, strongly believing that critical evidence is the product of illegal police activity, is not likely to even file the case. In these situations, whether the police officer learns that he or she illegally seized a piece of evidence will depend upon how well the prosecutor or police supervisor communicates with the offending officer. Again, any such communication is haphazard at best.

Prior to a case even reaching a prosecutor, as the Supreme Court observed, the Exclusionary Rule "is powerless to deter invasions of constitutionally guaranteed rights where the police either have no interest in prosecuting or are willing to forgo successful prosecution in the interest of serving some other goal." [FN50] In other words, where police invade a citizen's Fourth Amendment rights, but do not prosecute that individual, *56 there is no outside review -- such as by a prosecutor or judge -- to inform the officer of the violation.

If the "educational" aspect of deterrence is too vague to reinforce the "right" and "wrong" ways to obtain evidence, among police officers, the "punitive" aspect of the Exclusionary Rule is even more questionable. This is because punishment for illegally obtaining evidence falls directly upon "the government" by forbidding the use of the illegally obtained evidence at trial. Such punishment does not fall upon the offending police officer and, subsequently, any punitive effect felt by the police officer will be fortuitous. The offending officer suffers no formal negative consequences for his or her illegal activity. To be sure, some police departments keep track of data involving illegal searches and seizures conducted by officers and may use the data in decisions concerning promotions, salary increases, and the like. In addition, officers who are found to have violated a defendant's constitutional rights, and who are aware of this finding, may feel responsible for a failed prosecution, and may suffer from loss of stature in the eyes of their colleagues. But because the punitive effect of the Exclusionary Rule reaches the offending officers only indirectly, if at all, it seriously compromises the ability to deter police misconduct. A police officer who has violated a defendant's rights is not held personally accountable for that violation. In fact, empirical studies support the view that the Rule has a minimal effect on the police officers' on-the-street behavior. This is the ironic effect of the American Exclusionary Rule: In essence, the present rule lacks the power to deter, even though deterrence is the primary objective cited by the Supreme Court for implementing and then retaining the Exclusionary Rule. [FN51]

Deterrence as sole purpose and exceptions are signs of backtracking

As stated above, American courts, in their effort to limit the broad application of the exclusionary rule, have focused on deterrence as the rule's sole justification. The emphasis on deterrence, however, has posed an impediment to alleviating the most troublesome aspect of the rule's operation. If deterrence is the exclusionary rule's only purpose, then dangerous criminals must go free, even if a constitutional violation was relatively minor or technical. This reasoning ignores the harmful effect that exclusion may occasionally have on the integrity of the courts. In a free society it is essential that the court command respect within the community, otherwise it will not be long before the authority of the court is diminished and the rule of law is threatened. Should this occur, the collective freedom of everyone within a society would be markedly diminished.

The other difficulty with the contemporary United States position is the judiciary's effort to scale back the rule's operation through the use of exceptions. These exceptions, as stated above, are rules which state that even when constitutional rights of the accused are violated in the obtainment of the evidence, they will still not be suppressed if one of the exceptions, such as the good faith exceptions applies.

The United States Mandatory Rule of Exclusion Is Due For a Make-Over: Discretionary Approach? Part 1 Direct Dealer Stores Zone
24 Hrs Best Seller Category
New Tags Get Cheapest Price Shopping
Benefit Buy Direct Directory

watches cell phone Buy Shure Pg14 Pg30 Wireless Headset System K7